Thursday 30 August 2012

Life as a Stage


Following on from the examination of how the 'self' is created, this week we looked at Dramaturgy. Simply put, this is the way in which life can be seen as a 'game' or 'drama'. In another long reading, Goffman argues that everybody 'performs' certain roles in everyday life. We will adjust our performance to suit the audience, time and place, cultivating the personality which is most appropriate. In this way, we do not always reveal our true selves. This idea of performance is put into words very nicely by none other than William Shakespeare (1623), who wrote:

All the world’s a stage,
And all the men and women merely
players;
They have their exits and their entrances;
And one man in his time plays many parts...”
(As You Like It, Act 2 Scene 7)

Goffman uses the idea of a front stage and backstage to explain the way in which our performances change. An example of this was given in the lecture (I found this one particularly helpful as I am a waitress myself): Waitresses must perform a certain role while in the restaurant – they must be polite to customers and be, as my boss calls it, the “hostess with the mostess”. This would be seen as the front stage. When the waitress goes out into the kitchen (backstage) she can relax somewhat and for example, vent about rude customers. I feel this backstage also allows us to maintain our front stage persona, by giving us somewhere to release the parts of our self which do not work with our front stage persona.

Another example which I was quite interested in, is the way in which celebrities handle these ideas of front stage and backstage. The introduction of social networking sites, such as Twitter, create a situation where the celebrity can somewhat escape their 'most' front stage performance, which I think would be official events/interviews, and instead allow fans to see another side of themselves which is getting closer to the backstage. However, even their 'tweets' must be staged. Alice Marwich and Danah Boyd argue that on Twiter “celebrity practice involves presenting a seemingly authentic, intimate image of self while meeting fan expectations and maintaining important relationships” (2011, 140).

I found Goffman's argument very interesting and the more I thought about it the more I could see how it works in almost all interactions. As was discussed last week, the social reality stops us from having everything we feel and do on display to every person, therefore allowing us to maintain specific relationships.



Goffman, Erving. (1971), 'Performances',The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Marwick, A and Boyd, Danah (2011), 'To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter' Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Sage, Vol.17: 139, 19th May. 

Thursday 23 August 2012

The 'self'


This week we focussed on the presentation of the self, specifically looking at Goffman's arguments in 'The Nature of Deference and Demeanor' (1967). The self is made up of two concepts. Deference refers to the interactions that occur between individuals, and the specific 'rituals' that must take place within the interaction. For example, complimenting one another. Demeanor, on the other hand, refers to the way in which we present ourselves to society, for example, through the way we dress.

My understanding is that Goffman argues we will change our 'self' to suit the social situation we find ourselves in. In this way, I will present a different version of myself when I am working as a waitress, to the one found on the dance floor on a Wednesday night, and this is different again to the one who sits drinking tea with my grandmother. These different versions of a self help us, and those around us, to maintain certain relationships.

When doing my readings for this week I couldn't help thinking about the way in which I will be employing a different 'self' this very weekend. The situation is that my boyfriend's sister has got a tattoo this week. To be honest, I don't really like any tattoos but this one is particularly bad. I saw a photo of it and think it looks awful – I can't understand why anyone would want that permanently on their skin. This Saturday night we have a family dinner, and I know she will want to show me it in person. To tell her what I actually think of the tattoo will be breaking these unwritten social rules. It will cause an awkward and embarrassing moment for everyone there. In order to help her and myself 'keep face' I have two options. Either I will need to assume a new 'self' who tells her that I think it is great, or avoid the topic altogether. I will perform what Goffman calls an 'avoidance ritual'. Although it is a trivial matter, I cannot help being worried about it. =P


Goffman, E (1967) 'The nature of deference and demeanor' Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour, Doubleday, Garden City, NY, pp 47-95.